TY - JOUR T1 - From genes to ecosystems: a synthesis of the effects of plant genetic factors across levels of organization. JF - Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences Y1 - 2009 A1 - JK Bailey A1 - Jennifer A Schweitzer A1 - Ubeda,Francisco A1 - Koricheva,Julia A1 - LeRoy,Carri J A1 - Madritch,Michael D A1 - Rehill,Brian J A1 - RK Bangert A1 - Fischer,Dylan G A1 - Allan,Gerard J A1 - Whitham,Thomas G KW - Animals KW - Arthropods KW - Ecosystem KW - Genetic Variation KW - Genetics, Population KW - Models, Genetic KW - Plant Development KW - Plants AB -

Using two genetic approaches and seven different plant systems, we present findings from a meta-analysis examining the strength of the effects of plant genetic introgression and genotypic diversity across individual, community and ecosystem levels with the goal of synthesizing the patterns to date. We found that (i) the strength of plant genetic effects can be quite high; however, the overall strength of genetic effects on most response variables declined as the levels of organization increased. (ii) Plant genetic effects varied such that introgression had a greater impact on individual phenotypes than extended effects on arthropods or microbes/fungi. By contrast, the greatest effects of genotypic diversity were on arthropods. (iii) Plant genetic effects were greater on above-ground versus below-ground processes, but there was no difference between terrestrial and aquatic environments. (iv) The strength of the effects of intraspecific genotypic diversity tended to be weaker than interspecific genetic introgression. (v) Although genetic effects generally decline across levels of organization, in some cases they do not, suggesting that specific organisms and/or processes may respond more than others to underlying genetic variation. Because patterns in the overall impacts of introgression and genotypic diversity were generally consistent across diverse study systems and consistent with theoretical expectations, these results provide generality for understanding the extended consequences of plant genetic variation across levels of organization, with evolutionary implications.

VL - 364 SN - 0962-8436 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&DbFrom=pubmed&Cmd=Link&LinkName=pubmed_pubmed&LinkReadableName=Related%20Articles&IdsFromResult=19414474&ordinalpos=3&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSumhttp://www.ncbi. IS - 1523 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Developmental trajectories in cottonwood phytochemistry. JF - Journal of chemical ecology Y1 - 2006 A1 - Rehill,Brian J A1 - Whitham,Thomas G A1 - Martinsen,Gregory D A1 - Jennifer A Schweitzer A1 - JK Bailey A1 - Lindroth,Richard L KW - Crosses, Genetic KW - Glucosides KW - Least-Squares Analysis KW - Nitrogen KW - Phenols KW - Populus KW - Proanthocyanidins AB -

We examined the hypothesis that ecologically important phytochemical traits differ predictably among various developmental zones of trees (i.e., mature and juvenile zones of individual trees and juvenile ramets that sprout from roots) and that the slope of this phytochemical gradient represents a "developmental trajectory." We focused on Populus fremontii (Fremont cottonwood), P. angustifolia (narrowleaf cottonwood), and their natural hybrids. Two major patterns emerged. First, within narrowleaf and hybrids, concentrations of important phytochemicals (condensed tannins and phenolic glycosides) differ greatly and predictably between developmental zones. Second, developmental trajectories differ greatly among these cottonwood species and their hybrids: Fremont exhibits a flat trajectory, narrowleaf a steep trajectory, and hybrids an intermediate trajectory, suggesting an additive genetic component and an ontogenetic basis to this phytochemical variation. Because diverse herbivorous species respond to the phytochemistry of their host plants, we predict that the developmental trajectories of plants play a major role in mediating ecological interactions and structuring communities, and that biodiversity in a stand of trees is determined by both interplant genetic diversity and intraplant ontogenetic diversity.

VL - 32 SN - 0098-0331 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&DbFrom=pubmed&Cmd=Link&LinkName=pubmed_pubmed&LinkReadableName=Related%20Articles&IdsFromResult=17001533&ordinalpos=3&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSumhttp://www.ncbi. IS - 10 ER -